Thursday, December 1, 2011

Spheres of Influence, Starting Local


How does change happen? How can we help push the stubborn gears of innovation in the right direction? A lot of us agree: change is required and I offer up my hand of help, but where are my efforts most needed, and how much impact will it really make?

Many charity organizations, and even now the occupy movement, are criticized for their impact factor or social merit. Frequently, we may ask ourselves: Is that 20 dollars a month to Friends of the Forest really making a difference? The world mustn’t stay the way it is, but I'm just a little bitty! What is the most effective way to contribute? Like any force of nature, a spark of change can only travel so far. What I've discovered is that like ripples in a pond you've got to start local. Each of us resides in many different types of communities and through these people that we know and the connections that we share our ideas can propagate and grow to set the groundwork for a better society to live in.

A community doesn't consist of just the people that live across the street and next door.  Communities are any party of people that are associated through some common ground.  It can be work related, kids, school, hobby or an interest group.  These communities represent some of the original strengths of our species, a place for communication and the aggregation of ideas.  We possess the gift of language and the power of sharing ideas is even stronger.  Common ground within communities is an important as a starting point.  Once people are associated or joined together through a mutual interest a bond of trust and understanding is formed.  As ideas cross flow between members, this initial bond allows for support and reinforcement.  This idea is most easily understood when considering people of different backgrounds, whether it be cultural, educational or professional.  For example a politician is going to have a hard time coming into a scientific community to induce any sort of change, just because there is no trust between the two parties.  However, a scientist within the community itself might have a better chance.

This is where I stand right now.   I see a lot within our society that is completely broken, but the big picture of it is an insurmountable problem, and not clearly identifiable.  Instead, I look into my own community, the scientific community.  Even within this structure and paradigm things have gone askew possibly as a result of the broken society at large and the pressure it puts on how communities function.  However, making changes in this sort of community could be an amazingly powerful catalyst for greater change.  As I was thinking about the issues presented in the Occupy movement I began to notice analogous problems within the scientific community that people rarely talk about.  Most significantly, the issue of corporate control of culturally influential commodities.  Down on Wall St. the voices are protesting for the release of media commodities from corporate domination, but these grasps stretch further into all industries which advertise as providing fulfilling and comfortable lives to the people of the masses.  Technology, as we all know, has grown to be the symbol of prosperity, security and advancement in our nation, but what drives this advancement and to what end?  Not only have the everyday people been cast under the spell of limitless information and social networking, but the workers, the developers, the scientist of technology have also been enticed into the same illusion of technical bliss and convenience.  Engineers and scientists are like any other people with a passion: devoted and determined to their craft, but seeking purpose and career stability. This vulnerability allows the great minds of our society to be lured into companies masquerading as harbingers of innovation and change.  But when you strip away the altruistic façade, at the core of all of these companies is a money making machine fueled by the success of advertisement and marketing, building faster, smaller, more powerful, more agile technology for a population that has been convinced of its necessity.

The solution I seek is simple. Awareness. Breaking the hypnosis bound on so many unassuming engineers and scientists and awakening them to their true responsibility and potential. The workers in these fields have a unique power because of the extensive knowledge they posses.  These perspectives on the complex workings of the universe, small and large, have the ability to provide greater understanding and advocacy in the formation of a more balance society.

This is my first small seed of an idea.  Rough and idealistic as it may seem, I’m optimistic that through conversations and debates the seed will grow and change into a stronger and more complex organism. As an engineering graduate student I’m surrounded by eager minds pursuing a variety of scientific endeavors.  This is my community, and these are the voices and perspectives I seek to commune with. I’m talking over beers and free food events, during meetings and seminars, on the couch and within my classes. I’m starting local.   

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Top Two Reasons Your Pessimism is Wrong

So recently as I've undertaken this new challenge to change the world, I've come against the same argument from opposition time after time- People don't change. The human race will never change. Futility. Why try at all. Sure, I could occasionally be found saying the same thing, but NO MORE. I've put some thought into it, and below are my top two reasons WE CAN CHANGE (is that a political slogan?)

1) The Scientific Revolution- "Hey Church, guess what I had an idea that the earth goes round the sun, and I checked it out for myself, and...turns out it does!"
2)The Civil Rights Movement- " Well, as much as I enjoy spending time in my garden, and cooking in the kitchen, I think I'd like to have the freedom to do some other things as well"